Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Techcrunch/~3/cO-UFYGDFOQ/
Sergio Garcia kellie pickler miranda kerr brian urlacher Xbox One NBA Mock Draft 2013 Xbox reveal
Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Techcrunch/~3/cO-UFYGDFOQ/
Sergio Garcia kellie pickler miranda kerr brian urlacher Xbox One NBA Mock Draft 2013 Xbox reveal
Olivia Black World Ending 2012 gossip girl Ink Master Jenni Rivera Funeral aspergers Richard Engel
At Princeton University Sunday, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke delivered the?baccalaureate address. It had very little to do with the economy and a lot to do with lessons for life.
By Brad Knickerbocker,?Staff writer / June 2, 2013
Professor Jeff Nunokawa holds Princeton University's ceremonial mace as Ben Bernanke, Chairman of the Federal Reserve, leads the processional out of the university chapel after giving the Baccalaureate address Sunday.
Rich Schultz/AP
EnlargeIt must be tough being Ben Bernanke, the weight of the economic world on your shoulders, or so it might seem. Sneeze out the wrong expletive and the dollar tumbles, hiccup and the stock market hiccups with you.
Skip to next paragraph' +
google_ads[0].line2 + '
' +
google_ads[0].line3 + '
Subscribe Today to the Monitor
Click Here for your FREE 30 DAYS of
The Christian Science Monitor
Weekly Digital Edition
?Following Bernanke comments, dollar hits three year high? reads a recent Monitor headline.
We can?t really know the Fed Chairman?s deep personal philosophy or theological underpinnings, but there seems to be a Zen-like quality about him, a certain calmness ? which is a good thing. Wouldn?t want that hand on the economy?s tiller to be shaky in any sense.
So when he speaks, whatever the venue, we pay attention.
On Sunday, it was his baccalaureate?address to graduating seniors at Princeton University, where he taught from 1985 to 2002 when he joined the Federal Reserve Board of Governors, eventually appointed to chair the Fed by President Bush in 2006.
Quoting poet Robert Burns, the New Testament (?I am sure my rabbi will forgive me,? he said.), and 20th century philosopher Forrest Gump, Bernanke laid out his advice. Being an economist, his had bullet points.
He considered using as his text the Ten Commandments.
But, he said, ?I don't have that kind of confidence, and, anyway, coveting your neighbor's ox or donkey is not the problem it used to be, so I thought I would use my few minutes today to make Ten Suggestions, or maybe just Ten Observations, about the world and your lives after Princeton.?
?All of what follows has been road-tested in real-life situations,? Bernanke note, ?but past performance is no guarantee of future results.?
Princeton grads are by definition part of the elite, many destined to join the wealthy one percent the Occupy movement demonstrated against.
To them he quoted the New Testament: ?From everyone to whom much has been given, much will be required; and from the one to whom much has been entrusted, even more will be demanded" (Luke 12:48, New Revised Standard Version Bible).
?Kind of grading on the curve, you might say,? he added.
He also recommended a ?close companion on your journey,? chosen for the more enduring qualities.
?Don't get me wrong, I am all for beauty, romance, and sexual attraction ? where would Hollywood and Madison Avenue be without them?? he said. ?But while important, those are not the only things to look for in a partner. The two of you will have a long trip together, I hope, and you will need each other's support and sympathy more times than you can count. Speaking as somebody who has been happily married for 35 years, I can't imagine any choice more consequential for a lifelong journey than the choice of a traveling companion.?
Here?s a summary of the Fed Chair?s guide to life after the Ivy League, courtesy of BusinesInsider.com:
"A time will come when you will want your own grown-up, busy, hyper-successful children to call you," said Bernanke, who has two adult children. "Also, remember who paid your tuition to Princeton."
chuck colson ufc 145 results orrin hatch marlon byrd charles colson humber raffi torres
13 hours ago
In a TODAY exclusive airing Monday, superstar Beyonce Knowles sits down with Savannah Guthrie, whom she invited to join her backstage at the Women?s Concert for Change in London.
Beyonce explains why she helped organize the event, which also features such talented women as Jennifer Lopez and Ellie Goulding. She also talks about why it?s important to empower girls, and much more. Tune in Monday!
Source: http://www.today.com/entertainment/exclusive-beyonce-sits-down-savannah-guthrie-6C10160770
Ryan Lanza Sandy Hook Univision josh hamilton Susan Rice the Who jon bon jovi
Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, center, accompanied by Treasury Secretary Jacob Lew, right, and Acting Labor Secretary Seth D. Harris, speaks about Social Security and Medicare , Friday, May 31, 213, at the Treasury Department in Washington. The government says Medicare?s giant hospital trust will not be exhausted until 2026, while the date that Social Security will exhaust its trust fund is unchanged at 2033. The date for Medicare is two years later than was projected last year. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)
WASHINGTON (AP) ? Medicare?s long-term health is starting to look a little better, the government said Friday, but both Social Security and Medicare are still wobbling toward insolvency within two decades if Congress and the president don?t find a way to shore up the trust funds established to take care of older Americans.
Medicare?s giant fund for inpatient care will be exhausted in 2026, two years later than estimated last year, while Social Security?s projected insolvency in 2033 remains unchanged, the government reported.
An overall slowdown in health care spending is helping Medicare. Spending cuts in President Barack Obama?s health care law are also having a positive impact on the balance sheet, but they may prove politically unsustainable over the long run.
The relatively good news about two programs that provide a foundation of economic security for nearly every American family is a respite, not a free pass. Program trustees urged lawmakers anew to seize a current opportunity and make long-term changes to improve finances. Action now would be far less jarring than having to hit the brakes at the edge of a fiscal cliff.
Politically, however, Friday?s positive report and the absence of a crisis could make legislative action less likely, especially in light of the lack of trust between President Barack Obama and Republicans in Congress. No end is in sight for the partisan standoff over what to do about Social Security and Medicare, two of the government?s costliest programs, and the mammoth budget deficits they help fuel.
Still, fresh warnings were sounded.
?Under current law, both of these vitally important programs are on unsustainable paths,? said economist Robert D. Reischauer, one of two independent public trustees overseeing the annual reports.
The window for action ?is in the process of closing even as we speak,? said his counterpart, Charles Blahous III, also a prominent economist.
Social Security provides monthly benefit checks to about 57 million people, including 40 million retirees and their dependents, 11 million disabled workers and dependents and 6 million survivors of deceased workers. Medicare covers nearly 51 million people, mainly retirees but also disabled workers.
If the funds ever become exhausted, the nation?s two biggest benefit programs would collect only enough money to pay partial benefits.
Social Security could cover only about 75 percent of benefits, while Medicare?s fund for hospital and nursing rehabilitation care could pay 87 percent of costs.
With 10,000 baby boomers turning 65 every day, America?s aging population is straining both programs.
While the combined Social Security fund was projected to be depleted in 2033, the trustees warned that the threat to one of its component trust funds that makes payments to workers on disability is much more urgent. They projected that the disability trust fund would deplete its reserves in just three years, in 2016. That date is unchanged from last year?s report.
Blahous said he hoped that would prod lawmakers to act on the broad challenges facing Social Security.
The remaining trustees are senior administration officials, including Treasury Secretary Jacob Lew and Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius. While acknowledging the need for long-term changes to improve program finances, they used the occasion of the annual report to assert that Obama?s policies are working, particularly his health care overhaul.
White House spokesman Josh Earnest saw validation in the reports, too. The Medicare numbers showed Obama?s health overhaul ?is having a positive effect on the deficit,? he said, while the Social Security report supports the president?s contention that the retirement program is ?not driving our short-term deficit.?
Motivation for both sides to tackle federal spending deficits ?always risky because of the pain that could cause voters ? has already declined because the improving economy has also pushed projected federal deficits downward. This year?s shortfall is now expected to be $642 billion, down from $1.1 trillion last year.
Obama has proposed significant changes to both benefit programs, in the context of budget talks. Those include a formula change that would pare cost-of-living increases for retirees, and nearly $400 billion in Medicare savings, mainly from cuts to service providers. Congressional Republicans want to do more, particularly on Medicare, by converting the program into a private insurance system.
Social Security is financed by a 6.2 percent tax on the first $113,700 of workers? wages, paid by both employers and workers. Congress temporarily reduced the tax on workers to 4.2 percent for 2011 and 2012, though the program?s finances were being made whole through increased government borrowing.
The Medicare tax rate is 1.45 percent on all wages, paid by both employees and workers.
Blahous said if Social Security?s shortfall were to be fixed immediately by boosting the payroll tax alone, that rate for workers and employers together would have to be increased from its current 12.4 percent to nearly 15.1 percent. If action were delayed until 2033 ? the year of insolvency ? the tax would have to rise to 16.5 percent.
If the savings were to come only from reducing benefits and were made immediately, the benefits would have to be cut 16.5 percent for both current and future recipients.
Targeting future beneficiaries alone would mean benefit cuts of nearly 20 percent.
Waiting until 2033 to impose the changes would mean benefit cuts of 23 percent for current and future recipients. If policymakers wanted to limit the cuts to future beneficiaries, even wiping out all of their benefits would not close the shortfall, said Blahous.
?The window of opportunity to deal with Social Security closes well before the early 2030s,? he said.
Not all the news was bleak.
The trustees projected a 2 percent Social Security cost-of-living increase for 2014. And the monthly Medicare Part B premium for outpatient care was projected to remain the same as this year. That?s generally $104.90, although upper-income retirees pay more.
The good news for Medicare may not last. The program?s future costs are difficult to estimate, subject not only to economic fluctuations and the aging society but also to the impact of the latest blockbuster drug or technological breakthrough.
Nonetheless, the trustees said the overall slowdown in health care spending is providing relief for Medicare. It was the main reason for extending the life of the trust fund by two years. The report said there was a particularly sharp drop in spending on nursing home care. Medicare pays for limited nursing home stays while patients recuperate from hospitalization.
Also cited were reductions in payments to popular Medicare Advantage plans, the private insurance alternative within the program. About 1 in 4 Medicare beneficiaries are in such plans, which offer lower out-of-pocket costs usually in exchange for limitations on the choice of hospitals and doctors. The plans had once been overpaid when compared to the cost of care in traditional Medicare, but Obama?s health care law cut back those payments.
Public trustee Reischauer, who specializes in health care economics, said he?s hopeful and cautiously optimistic that the slowdown in health care costs will continue.
HHS Secretary Sebelius said the health care overhaul ?has helped put Medicare on a more stable ground without eliminating a single guaranteed benefit.?
But the top Republican on the Senate Finance Committee, Utah Sen. Orrin Hatch, said the report ?shouldn?t give anyone comfort? because Medicare?s slower spending reflected the country?s weak economy, even as the program faces rapidly growing numbers of recipients.
?Reforming Medicare and Social Security is a national imperative that policymakers on both sides of the aisle and at the White House must embrace if we are going to protect those programs for our seniors and for future generations, while simultaneously bringing down our sky-high debt,? Hatch said
AARP, the seniors lobby, said it will continue to fight cuts in either program.
___
AP Economics Writer Martin Crutsinger contributed to this report.
This entry was posted on May 31, 2013, 2:24 pm and is filed under Business. You can follow any responses to this entry through RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
Espn Fantasy Football Grandparents Day 2012 army wives 60 minutes go daddy Tom Kenny Long Island Medium
Alt-week takes a look at the best science and alternative tech stories from the last seven days.
We've not had a week quite as exciting as this in... well, weeks! Not only has a team of paleontologists discovered mammoth remains with liquid blood, there's good news for future generations who'd rather put their feet up (while hiding from mammoths, we assume). This is alt-week.
marie colvin cm punk cm punk lint buenos aires train crash argentina train crash nancy pelosi
By Dylan P. Gadino | May 31, 2013 at 2:28 pm | 27 comments | News, Opinion | Tags: jezebel, jim norton, Lindy West, Totally Biased, w. kamau bell
Last night?s debate between comedian Jim Norton and Jezebel writer Lindy West on Totally Biased with W. Kamau Bell was moving swimmingly until the latter characterized comedy clubs as ?dark basements full of angry men.? It was in response to Bell?s question, ?Are comedy clubs inherently hostile environments for women?? to which a reasonable feminist would have immediately exclaimed ?no? followed by an explanation of how a comedy club ? or any place ? could become a hostile environment depending on the makeup of a specific group of people and how singling out comedy clubs as Anti-Women Headquarters is absurd.
?On a fundamental level, it?s not an awesome place to be,? West continued about comedy clubs. ?And then there?s a dude on the stage saying, ?Hey wouldn?t it be hilarious if everyone raped that girl. And everyone laughs.??
I?m sure West has seen her share of live comedy shows. I bet I?ve seen a few more than her, having covered nothing but comedians for the last eight years. I?ve never seen anything remotely like what she described. I get it. She was referring to that one time Daniel Tosh was heckled for telling a rape joke and then delivered a moronic comeback, wherein he imagined multiple guys raping the heckler. Like I said, moronic.
However, disseminating a generalization about comedy just as moronic does not move the conversation forward. Also, constantly shrugging your shoulders throughout the debate and calling one of Bell?s questions ?dumb? (which West does only two minutes into a 16-minute segment) similarly doesn?t do a lot for the cause. But at the 5:05 mark of the uncut interview below (video is queued), something even more damning occurs.
West makes a rape joke.
As West continues to reference the Tosh incident, she explains that his comeback was inappropriate, in part, because sometimes ?everyone? does rape that girl. ?I don?t mean that the people in the club then rally and say ?Oh, I?m not doing anything? (looks at an imagined watch on her wrist)??
She gets laughs. Lindy nailed it.
?It?s actually really trivializing to say that mocking and exploiting a rape victim?s trauma to her face ? because there will be women in that audience and probably men who have been sexually assaulted ? is the same as making fun of a thing,? she says.
But didn?t she do just that? Is she excused from making a rape joke because the broader context of her appearance on Totally Biased was to defend would-be victims of rape? Does she get a rape-joke pass because she?s a woman? Did she not tell the joke from the perspective of the rapists (a point of contention for her when comedians do the same) during her quick quip?
To be clear, the joke was not a natural extension of her argument; those words were superfluous. She inserted those words for one reason: to get a laugh. Surely she didn?t mean to trivialize rape, right? Rather, it seems that maybe she was trying to inject levity into an otherwise serious debate in order to maintain the audience?s attention and perhaps draw out the stigma of being a victim of sexual violence.
In the end, her joke might have been the most valuable part of her appearance? because her flip attitude and broad generalizations about comedy certainly didn?t help.
Be sure to subscribe to the weekly Laughspin Podcast on iTunes or on SoundCloud for all the latest comedy news, audio clips and more! Listen to the most recent episode below!
michigan primary results olympia snowe davey jones dead boston weather dr seuss birthday derrick williams romney michigan